Distinguishing FIT in Screening from FIT in Assessment of the Symptomatic
|
Characteristic |
FIT in Screening |
FIT in the Symptomatic |
Target Population |
Asymptomatic individuals eligible to participate in structured screening programmes, eligibility age criteria differs from nation to nation in the UK. Older individuals above the eligibility age range in their country can choose to “opt-in”. |
Patients of any age who present in primary care with lower abdominal symptoms such as rectal bleeding, a change in bowel habit to constipation or diarrhoea, unexplained weight loss, anaemia, abdominal pain, and abdominal or rectal mass. In addition, some patients seen at certain secondary care clinics such as gastroenterology, will benefit. |
Aim |
To select those participants in screening programmes who have no symptoms but are at highest risk of colorectal neoplasia – cancer and high-risk (advanced) adenomas. |
To identify those patients who are most unlikely to have significant colorectal disease and would not benefit from referral for colonoscopy, saving resources and shortening waiting times, as well as identifying those who have significant colorectal disease and would benefit. |
Purpose |
Rule in significant colorectal disease, such as cancerous growths and high-risk adenomas. |
Rule out significant colorectal disease (cancer + high-risk adenomas + inflammatory bowel disease).
Rule in significant colorectal disease. |
Faecal Haemoglobin (fHb) Cut-off Concentration Used |
High – especially in countries with colonoscopy constraints. This is based on providing the screening programme performance characteristics desired, such as the positivity rate with which the available colonoscopy resource could cope. |
Low – 10 µg Hb/g faeces is widely recommended – selected to ensure that patients with “negative” results, most unlikely to have significant colorectal disease, do not necessarily get early referral for colonoscopy. And, if “positive”, stimulates early referral to secondary care for further investigation. |
Interpretation of Results |
A “positive” result means that a risk of significant colorectal disease is present and further investigation is warranted. A “negative” result means the participant should be invited again at the set screening interval. |
If the result is “negative”, there is considerable reassurance that significant colorectal disease is not present. However, safety netting should be in place to ensure abdominal symptoms are investigated appropriately. A “detectable” faecal haemoglobin means that the patient warrants further investigation. |
Potential Harms |
Not all colorectal disease is detected – interval cancer proportions are high when high faecal haemoglobin cut-offs are applied. Thus, a “negative” result does not mean that colorectal disease is absent, and participants receive information on lifestyle and symptoms. There is a “reassurance” effect of a “negative” result. Moreover, a “positive” result does not mean that colorectal disease is present, but the participant may undergo an invasive and potentially harmful investigation. |
FIT in assessment of the symptomatic is not perfect and some colorectal disease will be missed if a “negative” result is used as guidance for no referral. Most cancers are detected, but a slightly greater proportion of high-risk adenomas and inflammatory bowel diseases are not detected. Thus, patients with “negative” results could be given reassurance, but possible alternatives such as watching and waiting, referral to secondary care clinics, or a repeat FIT might be warranted, particularly if symptoms persist. |
Additional Benefits |
Not only cancer detected but also some high-risk adenomas, which are sometimes precursors of cancer and inflammatory bowel disease. |
Not only possibility of significant colorectal disease being “excluded”, but cancer, high-risk adenomas, which are sometimes precursors of cancer, and inflammatory bowel disease detected. |
Potential Improvements |
As FIT screening progresses and as the available colonoscopy resource expands, implementation of lower cut-offs over time would increase detection of cancer and more high-risk adenomas. |
Investigation of more analytically sensitive methods for detection of faecal haemoglobin since many patients have undetectable faecal haemoglobin with current methodology. Use of FIT result in combination with other variables such as blood haemoglobin. |